The Mihir Chronicles

Being Logical | A Guide To Good Thinking by Dennis Q. McInerny

July 09, 2020

I. Brief Summary

This book was recommended by Robert Ultimo, professor at Feltre School. Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking by Dennis Q. McIner aims to help readers think and reason well. I wanted to understand the flip side of logical thinking. What makes someone illogical? I found the middle to later part of the book loaded with valuable lessons. The first section of the book felt redundant to me, but nonetheless, an important literature.

II. Big Ideas

The book is divided into 5 sections.

Part One—Preparing the Mind for Logic

This section talks about the preparations we need to make in order to think and reason well.

  • Facts—objective facts of the external world.
  • Ideas—are the "representations" of the objective facts.
  • Mind—ours and those of others.
  • Words—are the linguistic expression of ideas and the building blocks of language.
  • Statements—are propositions which are the building blocks of logic.
  • Knowledge—consists of objective facts, ideas and words.

Part Two—The Basic Principles of Logic

This section talks about the principles of logic that governs logical thinking. First principles are self-evident and cannot be proven like an an axiom that cannot be deduced from any other within a system.

  • The principle of identity.
  • The principle of the excluded middle.
  • The principle of sufficient reason.
  • The principle of contradiction or non-contradiction.

Part Three—Argument: The Language of Logic

An argument is basically the linguistic expression of logical thinking. It is a claim that is justified by reasons and/or evidences. It has two elements:

  • Premises (major and/or minor)
  • And a conclusion

An argument is composed of statements or propositions which has a conclusion supported by premises. There are two kinds of arguments:

  • Deductive arguments—if successful, yield necessarily true conclusions.
  • Inductive arguments—if successful, only yield conclusions that are probably true.

A good argument has to fulfill these requirements:

  • Its premises (or contents) are true and relevant.
  • And, its form (or structure) is valid.
  • In the case of inductive arguments, the premises must also be strong enough to support the conclusion.

Logic is both science and art. Arguments have two purposes:

  • To produce true conclusions (science).
  • To persuade people using story-telling (art).

Part Four—The Sources of Illogical Thinking

This section talks about attitude that must be avoided for any irrational thinking. Emotions or perception can influence reasoning or negatively affect reasoning when an objective goal is to search for truth.

Part Five—The Principal Forms of Illogical Thinking

This section lists logical fallacies. There are two categories of logical fallacies, the formal and the informal logical fallacy.

  • Formal logical fallacies are mistakes that involve the “form” or “structure” of the argument.
  • Informal logical fallacies are mistakes that a person commits when, instead of addressing his opponent's argument, he diverts his or the audience's attention.

III. Quotes

  • Logic is about clear and effective thinking. It is a science and an art.
  • We all know people who are very bright but who do not always shine when it comes to being logical. They have the ability to think logically—that is, clearly and effectively—but that ability does not habitually manifest itself. The likelihood is that it has never been properly developed, pointing to a deficiency in their education. Indeed, logic is the very backbone of a true education, and yet it is seldom taught as such in American schools. To my mind, logic is the missing piece of the American educational system, the subject that informs every other subject from English to history to science and math.
  • In logic, as in life, it is the obvious that most often bears emphasizing, because it so easily escapes our notice.
  • A knack for its effective use, for logic and language are inseparable.
  • For the firm factualism of the world in which we live, for logic is about reality.
  • Being Logical seeks to produce practitioners, not theoreticians—people for whom knowing the principles of logic is in the service of being logical.
  • Many mistakes in reasoning are explained by the fact that we are not paying sufficient attention to the situation in which we find ourselves. That very familiarity causes us to make careless judgments about facts right before our eyes. We misread a situation because we are skimming it.
  • The phrase “to pay attention” is telling. It reminds us that attention costs something. Attention demands an active, energetic response to every situation, to the persons, places, and things that make up the situation. It is impossible to be truly attentive and passive at the same time. Don’t just look, see. Don’t just hear, listen. Train yourself to focus on details. The little things are not to be ignored, for it is just the little things that lead us to the big things.
  • Don’t just hear, listen. Train yourself to focus on details. The little things are not to be ignored, for it is just the little things that lead us to the big things.
  • A fact is something made or done. It has clear objective status. It is something we respond to as having an independent status all its own. It is naggingly persistent, demands recognition, and can be nasty if ignored.
  • Facts can also be thought of as objective or subjective. Both things and events are objective facts. They exist in the public domain and are in principle accessible to all. A subjective fact is one that is limited to the subject experiencing it. A headache would be an example of a subjective fact. If I am the one experiencing the headache, then I have direct evidence of its factualism.
  • An idea is the subjective evocation of an objective fact. Clear ideas, then, are ideas that faithfully reflect the objective order from which they derive. Unclear ideas, conversely, are those that give us a distorted representation of the objective world.
  • To ensure that our ideas are clear, we must vigilantly attend to the relationship between any given idea and its object.
  • If they are clear ideas, the links are strong. The most efficient way to clarify our ideas is to look through them to the objects they represent.
  • The more we focus on our ideas in a way that systematically ignores their objective origins, the more unreliable those ideas become.
  • The healthy bonds that bind together the subjective and objective orders are put under great strain, and if we push the process too far, the bonds may break.
  • When we speak of “establishing a fact,” we do not refer to establishing the existence of an idea in the mind. The idea in the mind, as we have seen, is a subjective fact, but the kind of fact we are concerned with establishing is an objective fact.